"Phango" container classes

[Lars Ivar Igesund]

Janice Caron wrote:

> On 10/2/07, 0ffh <spam at frankhirsch.net> wrote:
>> BTW I hope this is not too OT, but:
>> I have not much idea of the Phobos and Tango internals, but as I read it
>> it would mostly be the distinct object (and exception?) classes that
>> make the most trouble in making those libs compatible, or am I mistaken?
> 
> I suspect there are a lot of people who are happy enough with Phobos's
> objects and exceptions, but who wouldn't say no to a few extra snazzy
> container and string classes.

The differences in the runtime aren't really about the API's of those
(Phobos and Tango will become compatible in that respect). As it is, I
would expect most (if not all) to want Tango's runtime ahead of Phobos'
given compatible interfaces.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango