Structure property bug?

[Regan Heath]

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> "Regan Heath" wrote
>> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> BTW, I looked through the entire spec, and cannot find operator 
>>> precedence anywhere.  Anyone know where it is?
>> It's not ideal but you can figure out precedence by looking at:
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/expression.html
>>
>> The first operator mentioned is , and it has the lowest precedence (due to 
>> how the syntax tree is parsed - I think).
>>
> 
> I think you are right about this, but it is VERY subtle.  I had to read it 
> for about 20 minutes before I understood what you are talking about.
> 
> It would be nice to have a table at the end, which summarizes the 
> precedence.  Walter?

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/12484.html

<g>

Regan