Structure property bug?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

"Regan Heath" wrote
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/12484.html
>
> <g>
>

Hm... I guess we know Walter's opinion :)  If it's just a question of not 
having time to do the table, would it be possible for someone to write one 
and submit it for Walter to include?  Because telling someone to manually 
parse the grammar to me is like telling someone to go read the compiler code 
to figure out the precedence.  I know a lot of good coders who don't 
necessarily read language grammar specs.  Even I, who understood generally 
what the grammar spec means, didn't get that the operator precedence was 
"hidden" in the grammar.  I generally ignore the grammar boxes and just read 
the english descriptions/examples.

-Steve