Don Clugston wrote: > Something I've noticed is that x.stringof and (x).stringof are > completely different. So (T!(1)).stringof is something else I'd try. I can second that. I remember once I had a templated struct and needed sizeof. "(StructT!(int)).sizeof" worked for me while the "StructT!(int).sizeof" didn't. Maybe "." binds closer than "!"? Regards, Frank