alternative D frontends should have a LLVM backend

[BLS]

LLVM advantages are well known, but IMO alternative D Frontends like DIL 
should have a LLVM backend because this will open us a backdoor to DOT 
NET via MSIL
Quote :
LLVM now has a new MSIL backend. llc -march=msil will now turn LLVM into 
MSIL (".net") bytecode. This is still fairly early development with a 
number of limitations.
End Quote
Problems? Yes indeed ...
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-March/008244.html

Your opinion ?

Bjoern