Const sucks

[Bruno Medeiros]

Janice Caron wrote:
> 
> I'm not quite sure why no one before now has suggested using "readonly" 
> to mean read-only and "const" to mean constant, but seems kind of a 
> no-brainer to me. You know - calling a thing what it is, instead of 
> something it's not. I know I'd be dead confused if int meant float, for 
> example.
> 

It was quite naive to think that no one had suggested keyword changes 
for this before. :P

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D