class design question (inner classes) - Oops

[coxalan]

Downs Wrote:

> I'm sorry.
> I didn't read/understand your requirements precisely.
> Of course, this _will_ entail a reference to the outer class. As they
> say, "oops".
> Sorry again.

No problem and thanks for your answer.
As you can see in my postings, it took me some time to see what really the matter is, too:

I know that in my case the reference to the outer class object will never change.
So I know that all references stored in the inner class objects will be the same and are  not necessary.

coxalan