D Conference Tango Phobos

[renoX]

Alexander Panek a écrit :
> simax wrote:
>> Seem so that phobos developer and the tango developer are 
>> incompatible. IMO this is the biggest argument against D.
> 
> I don't think so. Since when is diversification a contra-argument?

When it is a 'core' part, diversification is a real minus: looks for 
example at all these stupid string libraries in C++ when there wasn't 
any useful one in the standard library and how it did hurt C++ very deeply.


So, the incompatibility of phobos/tango is definitely a minus: my boss 
would ask me, so which one will stay 'maintained'?

And I would answer honestly: I don't know, one of them is probably going 
to die though because they're occupying the same 'niche'.

So IMHO the sooner one dies or is made compatible with the other, the 
better it will be for D users.

renoX