Latest const expansion

[Janice Caron]

On 9/13/07, Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+spam at com.gmail> wrote:
> I think it would be
> even better to have this:
>
> final const(T) - head/tail const
> const(T)       - tail const

That's what we had in D2.0. That's what we've just got rid of.

Almost nobody likes the notion that const(T) should mean something
different from const T. That idea has already been rejected as being
too confusing.