Walter is right about transitive readonly - here's the alternative

[Bruno Medeiros]

Janice Caron wrote:
 >...

So, does that mean that if I wanted logical constness, but didn't use 
multi-threading at all in my classes with logical constness, I would 
still have to:

   a) write my classes with threading constructs as "shared", 
"readable", and "writable", instead of just putting a mutable member?
   b) have performance penalties because of mutex locking/unlocking?



-- 
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D