Two "standard" libraries???

[BLS]

Jascha Wetzel schrieb:
> BLS wrote:
>> Carsten Sørensen schrieb:
>>> What I would like to see is tango being adopted as _the_ standard
>>> library for D. Clean slate. Possibly with a phobos compatibility layer.
>>> If that's not possible, simply drop phobos and force people to use to
>>> use tango with D 3.0. 
>>
>> Drop Phobos. Vote++.
>> Rationale-
>> PRO Tango :
>> 1) Tango is community driven (more or less) Phobos is not.
>> 2) Tango's functionality grows with every litte update, Phobos is at a 
>> stand still.
>>
>> Pro Phobos :
>> 1) Is allways up to date with the latest D compiler.
>>
>>
>> General :
>> 1) The D library situation is still lousy.  Standard-GUI, Database, 
>> DTL, communication  ... So having two "standard libraries" is a 
>> complete waste of time and human resourses.
>> Bjoern
> 
> drop phobos? no way!
> what's wrong with joining the runtime libs?
> 
> import std.string;
> import tango.io.FilePath;
> 
> => everybody happy

LOL !

What about DTL ? DTL Tango, DTL Phobos ? No Sir...