Template namespaces - Obsolete?

[Walter Bright]

Janice Caron wrote:
> Now that we can do:
> class A(T);
> struct A(T);
> union A(T);
> T func(T)(T x);
> static int func(int n);
> ...
> etc.
> 
> Is there any need, any more, for the old fashioned
> 
> template t(T)
> {
>     int f();
>     int g();
> }
> 
> and having to refer to t!(T).f() and t!(T).g() ?

Yes. It makes sense to logically group related templates together, 
instead of the C++ ad-hoc approach where a file has a mess of arbitrary 
looking templates, and no organizational cues as to which ones belong 
together.