Feature request - simpler constructors

[Jascha Wetzel]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Janice Caron wrote:
>> Please could we let
> 
> I think it's a good idea, but I think using the function signature for 
> it probably is not the best idea (as the function signature is for the 
> interface, not the internals).

maybe macros could sort this one out. they'd need variadic or tuple 
parameters:

macro thisInit(T...)
{
   foreach ( t; T )
     this.t = t;
}

this(int a, float b)
{
   thisInit(a,b);
}

...or similar.