nan question

[Nathan Reed]

bobef wrote:
> BCS Wrote:
> 
> 
>> if you want to check for nan without a function call uses: fpVar !<>= 0
>>
>>
> 
> 
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I am not laughing at you, thanks for the help, but something is totally wrong. Just look at this. "!<>=" it looks almost like bytecode or 1337 or something :)

Read it as "fpVar is not less than, greater than, or equal to zero."

The only 'number' that satisfies all these conditions is NaN.

Thanks,
Nathan Reed