nan question

bobef bobef at abv_nospam.bg
Tue Sep 25 09:53:19 PDT 2007


Janice Caron Wrote:

> On 9/25/07, bobef <bobef at abv_nospam.bg> wrote:
> > something is totally wrong. Just look at this. "!<>="
> 
> Well consider, the imaginary number i is not less than one. It is also
> not greater than one. It is also not equal to one. It makes perfect
> sense.

I can't imagine such number, sorry :) But let aside my imagination. I don't know what imaginary number is, so I am not commenting if it makes sense. All I'm saying it that it is nonsense that if(double.nan!=double.nan) returns false (IMHO).



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list