Right now, what's the most important for the success and adoption of D?

[Extrawurst]

if i had to narrow it down to just the most important for me i would say:

1) FAR more bugfixes, thats what makes development in D most annoying. ( 
phobos as well as dmd )

that is by far the most important to me right now!

2) speaking of standard libs: i dream of having just one! no decision 
anymore whether to use phobos or better tango!
3) some innovative new parrallel coding abilities included in language. 
(i think thats a placer where u can really seperate from any other 
compiled languages today)

--Extrawurst

Bruno Medeiros schrieb:
> I wanted to probe the D community of the following issue:
>
> Right now, what would the most important thing for the success and 
> adoption of D? In other words, if one had to use D to develop a medium 
> or large scale software, what would be the most important things to 
> have, that we currently don't have (or aren't good enough)?
> (I'm not talking only about language features, in case you didn't get 
> that)
>
> I ask this on the onset of seeing several people commenting on how 
> they can't wait until we have AST macros, or how the feature X would 
> be awesome to have, while me, now that I actually started to some 
> coding in D (even if in a very small project), would actually rate 
> those a much lower priority versus other things I'd like to have in 
> the D ecosphere.  I'll do some more comments on this but first I'd 
> like to hear about other people's opinions.
>