Right now, what's the most important for the success and adoption of D?

[Anders F Björklund]

Sean Kelly wrote:

>> Hopefully the differences between DMD/GDC and Phobos/gPhobos will also
>> grow smaller (they are mostly about portability to Unix, and to 64-bit)
>> If nothing else, then just because it's annoying in the end to have to
>> write code for both "version(linux)" (DMD) and "version(Unix)" (GDC)...
> 
> The differences between the DMD and GDC runtimes in Tango are smaller 
> than phobos/internal vs. gphobos/internal, but additional work is still 
> required.  To do so would be fairly simple though--nearly all of the 
> differences are in the memory allocation routunes in internal/gc.d 
> (lifetime.d in Tango).

Then again to support Tango, I would also need to add "version(Posix)"
to the mix - but it's good to hear that DMD and GDC runtimes are closer.

--anders