Fully transitive const is not necessary

[Tim Burrell]

Janice Caron wrote:
> On 01/04/2008, Tim Burrell <tim at timburrell.net> wrote:
>>  Instead of going ... the way D is
>>  going now ... why not take the time to find a really
>>  good, simple and effective solution?
> 
> <slaps head> Doh! Why anyone else think of that before!?

I get the sarcasm, and it's funny... but it rings a bit of truth too. 
Nothing has been proposed for D and concurrency thus far!  I think it's 
an important discussion too.