Workarounds for Lack of Mutable Keyword

[Janice Caron]

On 03/04/2008, Craig Black <craigblack2 at cox.net> wrote:
>  If that compiles, I think it may be a bug.  Invariant types shouldn't be
> implicitly convertible to const.

Yes they should.

const means "I promise not to modify this". There is absolutely no
problem with promising not to modify something which is invariant.