Forums suffering Priority Inversion with Livelock

[BCS]

Daniel wrote:
> I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I'm noticing a livelock
> priority inversion in the forums.  Everyone's spending months arguing
 > about constness, when there are clear, simple, and higher priority
 > issues to resolve.

I've noticed the same thing, I long ago (back about the time 2.000 came 
out) stopped reading const threads because I realized, I don't care. 
I'll let other's trash it out and then use it when it's done.

> 1) The x86-32 platform is obsolete, and D still can't run x86-64, 

x86-32 may be obsolete, but it's still fairly viable.

OTOH, your point is a good one, there are things that could use some TLC.