Storage class consistency

[Sean Kelly]

== Quote from Robert Fraser (fraserofthenight at gmail.com)'s article
> I understand Walter probably thought it through and decided that this
> inconsistency was worth it to be able to use a confusing keyword, but
> these are the sort of reasons it's difficult for me to get excited about
> D2. Is there any particular reason this was thought unimportant?

Near as I can tell, it was the desire to avoid the creation of an additional
keyword that was the driving force behind the decision, as well as an
apparent desire to allow addressability for invariant data.


Sean