Normalizing Const Syntax.

[Georg Wrede]

Hans W. Uhlig wrote:
> same for classes:
> 
> const class foo § extends bar {
>     const int x;
>     pure foo(const int, const double) § returns invariant string;
>     // ... more code ...
> }
> 
> (Note: § is used as a divider because no one uses it for anything in 
> programming and I didn't want to start an argument over : or | or ; or 
> any other punctuation being used elsewhere and being bad, quite possible 
> punctuation wouldn't be neccessary)

It's not used because it's not found in the american keyboard.