Yet another MRV proposal!

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"downs" <default_357-line at yahoo.de> wrote in message 
news:ftvci0$2iep$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Extrawurst wrote:
>> What speaks against solving the MRV issue by allowing tuples(TypeTuple)
>> as return types ? I would love to see that..
>
> Well yeah, me too :) but this is probably easier to implement, and as 
> such, has a higher chance of actually _happening_.
>
> (Tuple MRV was proposed before)
>
> --downs

Easier to implement?

Think about it: what's the difference between a struct and a tuple?

<_<

>_>

(Hint: not a whole lot)

And this is something I'd like to see explored in a few more areas than just 
MRVs ;)