Normalizing Const Syntax.

[Bruno Medeiros]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Georg Wrede wrote:
> 
>> Only an idiot would spread the attribute over several pages.
>>
>> This of course means that if one has a class or simply a list of 
>> definitions, that starts to grow multi-line, there comes a point where 
>> the attribute envelope should be deleted and the definitions 
>> attributed individually. (A good text editor should do this, btw.)
> 
> Good point.  A rule of thumb may be that the attribute should never be 
> more than 1/2 a page of code away from where it applies.  If it starts 
> to get more than that, then you should switch your style (perhaps to 
> labeling every function a la Java.)
> 
> --bb

Proponents of attribute blocks might say that one of the intended uses 
of it is when you have lots of declarations (ie, more that 1/2 pages of 
code).

Anyways, I'm also not a fan of attribute blocks. For one reason, because 
I like each definition to be self-contained. Second, because I like to 
group related functions together, and often these groups have mixed 
protections (private, public, protected, etc.). If I was to use 
attribute blocks I would have to bundle all private methods of the scope 
together, all public methods together, etc..

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D