DDoc Improvments

[Jason House]

Pragma wrote:

> This post is intended to foster some discussion about DDOC.  The richness
> of DDOC's output is an old gripe of mine, but maybe we can get some
> traction on a better solution than what we have now.
> 
> In short: I'd love to digest DDOC generated content as raw XML, so I can
> compose cross-references for large (tango-sized) projects.  CandyDoc does
> a lot to replace some of the things that are left out, but I can't help
> but feel that it's merely a patch to a more fundamental problem with how
> things are output.


I like the idea of xml with style sheets for ddoc too.  Done right, that
might even help out the IDE developers...  I think there was some
discussion about extracting basic (parsed) information.