Cilk/Cilk++

Robert Jacques sandford at jhu.edu
Mon Aug 11 17:00:12 PDT 2008


On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:07:24 -0700, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com>  
wrote:
> The main problem I see is combining this form of parallelism with other  
> ones.

Cilk is a less flexible (and also probably less efficient) version of  
futures/promises. As such it's a subset of CSP and can be combined with  
threading, etc. fairly easily.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list