Multiple Inheritance of Classes

[Yigal Chripun]

superdan wrote:
> Yigal Chripun Wrote:
> 
>> About your first thought: can you compare your (C++ templates)
>> solution with D mixins? why would I choose that approach instead of
>> template mixins if it's only good for inheritance of
>> implementation? I think (and I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm
>> wrong) that mixins remove the need for that pattern entirely.
> 
> how would the mixin solution look like?

I've attached a file with a sample solution with mixins. you can put
both mixins in the most derived class or put one inside the other  (as
it is now)

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: templates.d
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20080813/aa30ae60/attachment.ksh>