Why so many theoretical discussions when ...

BCS ao at pathlink.com
Fri Aug 29 18:05:50 PDT 2008


Reply to Christopher,

> Denis Koroskin wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:49:50 +0400, Vincent Richomme
>> <forumer at smartmobili.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I am watching this newsgroup everyday and it's like a drug but I can
>>> see   so many discussions about implementation, performances, ...
>>> The problem is as D user I just want a good language and if the
>>> first
>>> implementation is not very fast I don't give a f..
>>> It seems your are talking about what could be done but why don't you
>>> just take in account current issues.
>>> If you look a few posts before mine you could see for instance :
>>> 'package' and access from subpackages.., it seems that there are
>>> some limitations to the package concept..
>>> 
>>> Why don't developpers focus on this ?
>>> 
>> It's a problem, people see and understand, but there is nothing else
>> we can do.
>> 
> See, understand, and agree. But people sitting around and agreeing
> doesn't take as much space as people sitting around and arguing.
> 

We agree on many things but when we can't change DMD all we have left is 
to argue over the details (some of us think this is "fun")

<g>





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list