Why so many theoretical discussions when ...

[Chris R. Miller]

Christopher Wright wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Walter Bright" <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote in message
>> news:g9a7eg$1k9b$3 at digitalmars.com...
>>> BCS wrote:
>>>> We agree on many things but when we can't change DMD all we have
>>>> left is to argue over the details (some of us think this is "fun")
>>> You can always change gdc, which is based on dmd, to try things out.
>>
>> Mucking around with GCC is an absolute mess (doubly true on windows).
>> Not that I'm disagreeing with you, though. FWIW, a D compiler written
>> in a better language (like D!) would be great for trying things out,
>> but I suppose that's just stating the obvious ;)  (BTW, What is LLVM
>> written in? C++, I assume? Haven't really had a chance to look into it
>> yet.) 
> 
> LLVM is written in a tasteful subset of C++. That's how its writers put
> it, at least.

Objective-C?

;-)



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20080830/dd9abd39/attachment.pgp>