Standardization of D

JMNorris nospam at nospam.com
Sun Feb 3 01:15:01 PST 2008


"Bruce Adams" <tortoise_74 at yeah.who.co.uk> wrote in
news:op.t5u0eef7xikks4 at starquake.cybernetics: 

> Design by comittee is reknowned for its speed even when there is
> concensus. Look at how long it took to get ISO C++ and they daren't
> put a definite  year
> to C++0x. It was probably a little optimistic putting a 0 there.

Maybe they're hoping to finish in time to have a C++0x10?  If so, they may 
not make it. :-)



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list