x.sizeof vs typeid(x)

[Sergey Gromov]

Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight at gmail.com> wrote:
>  From my limited experience with C#, I know there's some kind of special 
> property syntax. Maybe something like this would be a better solution?
> 
> private double myDistance;
> public property distance
> {
>     double __get { return myDistance; }
>     void __set(double val) { myDistance= val; }
>     double* __addressOf { return &myDistance; }
> }
> 
> double x = distance;    // x = distance.__get();
> distance = 50.0;        // distance.__set(50.0);
> double* p = &distance;  // p = distance.__addressOf();
> 
> And maybe add more property-properties as needed. This would make them 
> first-class, fully interchangeable with variables.

Yes, this would be far more consistent of course.  I've just tried to 
keep to the current syntax and semantics as close as possible.
-- 
SnakE