Standard Library Concerns (Phobos / Tango)

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Fri Feb 8 14:04:57 PST 2008


Tim Burrell wrote:
> I think that your response will be a bit disappointing to some, me
> included.  It doesn't really address those of us who have gone on record
> and stated that the current maintenance schedule of Phobos isn't sufficient.
> 
> Nor does it address the feeling many of us have of being unable to
> contribute to Phobos.
> 
> If last November saw major additions, why have patches to know bugs that
> were submitted prior to then remained ignored?
> 
> I think your idea on having a compatible core for Phobos and Tango is
> great, but how do we get there?

These are all real issues, and need to be taken care of. I don't know 
what the answer is yet.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list