Standard Library Concerns (Phobos / Tango)
Walter Bright
newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Fri Feb 8 14:04:57 PST 2008
Tim Burrell wrote:
> I think that your response will be a bit disappointing to some, me
> included. It doesn't really address those of us who have gone on record
> and stated that the current maintenance schedule of Phobos isn't sufficient.
>
> Nor does it address the feeling many of us have of being unable to
> contribute to Phobos.
>
> If last November saw major additions, why have patches to know bugs that
> were submitted prior to then remained ignored?
>
> I think your idea on having a compatible core for Phobos and Tango is
> great, but how do we get there?
These are all real issues, and need to be taken care of. I don't know
what the answer is yet.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list