Standard Library Concerns (Phobos / Tango)
Christopher Wright
dhasenan at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 05:21:20 PST 2008
Ameer Armaly wrote:
> The point is not to divide the actual code as much as it is to divide the
> nitches. Take whatever the given library does best, and decide where it
> should go. If Tango does IO faster, then we should somehow merge that in to
> phobos. If certain parts of Phobos are too specialized, then they ought to
> go in to Tango. The specifics of course are left open to debate.
So you want Phobos to be a small standard library with Tango providing
everything else that people will commonly use. I don't see the point in
this, unless Tango starts suffering from its size.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list