Standard Library Concerns (Phobos / Tango)

Christopher Wright dhasenan at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 05:21:20 PST 2008


Ameer Armaly wrote:
> The point is not to divide the actual code as much as it is to divide the 
> nitches. Take whatever the given library does best, and decide where it 
> should go. If Tango does IO faster, then we should somehow merge that in to 
> phobos. If certain parts of Phobos are too specialized, then they ought to 
> go in to Tango. The specifics of course are left open to debate. 

So you want Phobos to be a small standard library with Tango providing 
everything else that people will commonly use. I don't see the point in 
this, unless Tango starts suffering from its size.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list