Why can't we define re-assignable const reference variable?

[Derek Parnell]

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:29:18 +0000, Janice Caron wrote:

>> Don't know whether that's the case or not currently.
> 
> I've been using it for a while now, and on the whole I find it very
> simple, elegant, and obvious.

So long as one isn't trying to do things that Walter disagrees with.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell