virgil language

[Robert Fraser]

Manfred Nowak wrote:
> bearophile wrote
> [about virgil and cited:]
>> Compile-time Initialization[: ...]
>> This computation phase is Turing-complete
> 
> AFAIR: in the eyes of Walter that would be a killer for D, because 
> administrators would have to worry about malware acting at compile 
> time.
> 
> -manfred

D's interpreter already is Turing-complete. It's not D-language-complete 
(that is, it doesn't deal with allocations, exceptions, etc.) but it 
_is_ a complete Turing machine.