My Kingdom For ...

[Moritz Warning]

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:53:00 -0700, Darryl Bleau wrote:

> bearophile wrote:
>> Another solution is to think "in" as an operator, and "!in" as two
>> operators, where ! negates the result of the precedent "in", where "in"
>> returns a pointer. I don't see this as silly :-)
> 
> I should have read this first. Yes, that's exactly what I would like.

Fwiw:
"is" may be no boolean operator, but "!" is a boolean operator.
Hence, "!is" can be boolean operator the same way as "=" is not a boolean 
operator, but "!=" is.