My Kingdom For ...

[Bill Baxter]

Robert Fraser wrote:
> Moritz Warning wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:53:00 -0700, Darryl Bleau wrote:
>>
>>> bearophile wrote:
>>>> Another solution is to think "in" as an operator, and "!in" as two
>>>> operators, where ! negates the result of the precedent "in", where "in"
>>>> returns a pointer. I don't see this as silly :-)
>>> I should have read this first. Yes, that's exactly what I would like.
>>
>> Fwiw:
>> "is" may be no boolean operator, but "!" is a boolean operator.
>> Hence, "!is" can be boolean operator the same way as "=" is not a 
>> boolean operator, but "!=" is.
> 
> Did you man "in"? "is" is a boolean operator.

I think Bill Clinton had something to say about this subject...
:-)
--bb