Feature Request - Raw HTML in ddoc comments
Derek Parnell
derek at psych.ward
Fri Feb 22 01:51:43 PST 2008
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:51:49 +0000, Janice Caron wrote:
> ddoc is OK for documenting functions and classes and the like, but
> tedious for more involved documentation such as a tutorial.
I must disagree. I wrote the entire documenation for Bud just using ddoc
and without embedded HTML. It's just a matter of writing the appropriate
'generic' macros and using them.
I've attached the 'macro' file I use.
To output into a differnet format, I'd use a different 'macro' file without
touching the document source files.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: user_manual.ddoc
Type: application/octet-string
Size: 3191 bytes
Desc: Attached file: user_manual.ddoc
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20080222/ace0b353/attachment.bin>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list