object.opEquals return type

[Edward Diener]

Janice Caron wrote:
> On 24/02/2008, Edward Diener <eddielee_no_spam_here at tropicsoft.com> wrote:
>> Why is the return type of object.opEquals an 'int' rather than a 'bool' ?
> 
> I haven't the faintest idea. However, I have submitted to bugzilla
> that the signature of opEquals (and opCmp, toString, etc.) should be
> fixed for const correctness. Perhaps the return type could be changed
> to bool in the same move? As in
> 
>     const bool opEquals(const(Object) o)

I fully agree that you have it correct above.