stability

[Leandro Lucarella]

Walter Bright, el 27 de febrero a las 17:17 me escribiste:
> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >Walter Bright, el 24 de febrero a las 21:58 me escribiste:
> >>John Reimer wrote:
> >>>In the case of gcc, the other way to look at the bug count (4265) is to realize that 
> >>>the number is the combined sum of four front ends (C, C++, Objective C, GNAT) and two 
> >>>processor IS targets (32 bit and 64 bit).  At least that is what I gathered from the 
> >>>link. So I think it's just a little unfair to compare dmd's bug count directly to 
> >>>gcc's, although I understand the point you were trying to make. :)
> >>Bug count is an uninformative measure of quality anyway.
> >I agree, that's why I'm still wondering why did you mention it in the
> >discussion :)
> 
> To illustrate my point!

But nobody mentioned the bug count. We are talking about annoying bugs
that you run into everyday, not 4000 bugs you never see in the day by day.
Maybe they are just 10, but they are a lot whorst than the 4K gcc bugs.
Not to mention the unimplemented specs (like the broken protection
attributes for modules and such).

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Every day 21 new born babies will be given to the wrong parents