Hmm - about manifest/enum

[Sean Kelly]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> 
>> The current decision to reuse 'enum' for manifest constants is yet 
>> another
>> example of a designer believing that their intuition is better than their
>> customers', regardless of any evidence to the contrary. Please reconsider
>> that there might be a remote possibility that this decision is actually
>> wrong in this case; 'enum' is not the best choice for developers when it
>> comes to declaring manifest constants.
> 
> There are a number of people who strongly feel it is the correct 
> decision who are not vocal about it.

I don't suppose the use of 'enum' in this context has had any impact on 
named enumerations?  ie. We still cannot have a named enum which 
contains strings, correct?  Also, are traditional unnamed enums still legal?

enum
{
     a, b, c
}

enum : long
{
     d, e, f
}


Sean