Remove complex and imaginary types?

[Christopher Wright]

Jason House wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>> I do too. And been thinking along the lines of simply putting a hack in 
>> that the postfix 'i' means that it's a literal of type 'imaginary', and 
>> the compiler looks to see if "std.complex" was imported.
>>
>> This isn't as outlandish as it sounds, as there's precedent for it both 
>> in C++ <typeinfo> and java.lang.String, as well as D's Object.
> 
> Any time a hack is needed, it's probably not the best solution.  Somewhere in this thread, people talked about a generic interface for postfix labels.  Examples given were i, ft, km.  I'd be really cool to see something like that make its way into the language instead of a hack.

I'd rather it were not. It reduces clarity, since the postfixes will be 
short and there will be a lot of collisions and it won't be clear where 
they are defined.