Dynamic Code in D

bearophile bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Sat Jan 12 14:52:33 PST 2008


CptJack:
> Once you begin to do some serious programming in Lisp, and know it 
> as well as you do your current language of choice, I think you will 
> find that it is /much/ faster to program in than any other language.

I like some sides of Lisp (and you have seen I too have suggest it as an option for this project), but I think you can't prove that. For example I don't think you can write serious programs in Lisp faster than in Python... ;-)
And to know CommonLisp as well as Java/D you may need years. If you know Java you can learn D rather well in less than 4-6 months. I think only C++ requires more learning time than CommonLisp :-)


> > That sounds exactly like what the Java version is already doing.
> 
> This is my point exactly. You've had to re-implement Lisp to get Java to
> do what you want, a-la Greenspun's Tenth Rule.

But if that's already work done, then there may be no need to write it again in Lisp :-)

Bye,
bearophile



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list