Notes IV

[bearophile]

Janice Caron:
> For that matter, it has two meanngs. So wouldn't
>     foreach (a; b in c)
> parse as
>     foreach (a; (b in c))
> which might actually make sense if c defines opIn_r(). So you'd still
> end up having to distinguish a comma from a semicolon anyway.

But this situation is probably 100 times less common than the normal usage of foreach, so this may produce way less bugs in the code, and you can add ().

Bye,
bearophile