Website changes/updates

[Jesse Phillips]

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:36:20 +0100, Don Clugston wrote:

> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Unknown W. Brackets wrote:
>>> IMHO, the font size wasn't bad before.  Nice to have a larger one with
>>> lots to read.  Just my opinion.
>>>
>>> Also I suggest a line-height of 1.4em for the content.  This generally
>>> makes large blocks of text (e.g. documentation, articles, blog posts)
>>> easier to read.
>>>
>>> Walter: if you're reading this, what are things you'd like to see the
>>> website do?  Aside from possible comments, it's better to get a full
>>> plan together (usually called the "discovery" phase) before jumping in
>>> and making a mess.
>> 
>> I don't know, except that I don't want it to be an ongoing time sink.
>> 
>> Some goals:
>> 1) easy to navigate
>> 2) easy on the eyes
>> 3) standards compliant
>> 4) fast loading
>> 5) printable with a print.css
>> 
>> Things to avoid:
>> 1) glitz
>> 2) fixed size pages
>> 3) long download times
>> 4) clever stuff that'll break with the next browser update
> 
> What do you think of the Tango site?
> (I'm sure there's some synergy to be found around here).

on that note, I'm still looking forward to the integration of the forums 
into track, among others. Any news on that?