A renewed call for interface methods with bodies

[BCS]

Christopher Wright wrote:
> Burton Radons wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to remind everyone about this lacking feature, why it's 
>> important, and how the lack of it negatively impacts interface use. 
>> It's important for two tasks: when you're writing an interface, and 
>> when you're using an interface from someone else (through COM/CORBA/etc).
> 
> 
> We have that, but you have to call it 'abstract class' rather than 
> 'interface'.
> 
> What you are asking for is essentially multiple inheritance -- that's 
> the only difference between the two that I can see.

these interfaces would have no data members.