Polishing D - suggestions and comments

[Sean Kelly]

Dan wrote:
> Jarrod Wrote:
>>
>> All I want to see is a standard, be it Phobos with all the cool stuff 
>> Tango adds, or a Tango with all the nice things Phobos has. But this 
>> isn't going to happen unless one of the dev teams concedes already :|
> 
> Fair assessment.  I think Tango is more open source and takes the load off Walter.  It's just simply too heavyweight for me to dare use it; so library developers go to Tango and library users still go to Phobos.  : p

Could you explain?  Tango was built from the ground up to be completely
modular, so I'm not sure I understand the opinion that it's heavyweight.
 One of the original design parameters was that it be as suitable for
kernel development as for application development, and I believe it's
accomplished this goal quite well.

> That guy who developed the cool Agner Fog optimized mixin algorithm should get access to an AST.  I'm sure he could write a kick-ass lib.

Once const is settled, I think we'll begin to see more of the 2.0
features Walter promised :-)


Sean