Polishing D - suggestions and comments

Robert Fraser fraserofthenight at gmail.com
Sat Jan 26 18:34:14 PST 2008


Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> I second that. Phobos is closer to C/C++ stdlib, Tango to Java/.NET.
> I think it would be great to have 2 "compatible" standard libraries. One
> minimalist for embeded and such (phobos) and one for "big" (or not that
> big) desktop applications (tango). Of course both should be compatible and
> it had more sense if the "big" library were a super-set of the "small"
> one.
> 

I'd rather use Tango for embedded systems development; it's more 
modular. It's very easy to rip out parts of Tango & still have it 
compiling, while Phobos is comparatively interdependent.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list