DMD back end dev-kit
davidl
davidl at 126.com
Tue Jul 1 23:11:17 PDT 2008
在 Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:51:01 +0800,Bill Baxter
<dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com> 写道:
> Robert Fraser wrote:
>> John Reimer Wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Bill,
>>>
>>>> It's been talked about before, but exactly how much money do the
>>>> people who own the copyright to DMD's backend want in order to make it
>>>> freely available freely -- as at least a lib? It's hard to believe
>>>> anyone would appraise that thing with a high dollar value given its
>>>> less than stellar optimization abilities, and since everyone knows you
>>>> can't make much money off dev tools these days anyway.
>>>>
>>>> I'd happily chip in $100 US if it meant finally having an official D
>>>> compiler that anyone can recompile for themselves just by typing "make
>>>> dmd".
>>>>
>>>> Or is it more a matter of not being able to find the copyright holders
>>>> in question to ask them? If so, give us the names and whatever info
>>>> you have, and I bet someone will be able to track 'em down.
>>>>
>>>> --bb
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd give another $100.
>>>
>>> -JJR
>> "Economic Stimulus Act" FTW.
>> Seriously, though, there's GDC. Maybe LLVMDC, too. So while I wouldn't
>> say no to a compiling lib of the backend, is it really needed?
>
> GDC's problem is that it is not well maintained.
> LLVMDC's problem is that it just isn't there yet.
>
> Until one of the above two situations changes, DMD will be the compiler
> I actually use.
>
> And it's worth at least $100 to me in the mean time to be able to build
> a working version of the D compiler I actually use. Being able to fix
> bugs for myself or with the help of the community means at least that
> much to me.
>
> So it's not a question of whether it is "needed". Obviously if it were
> really needed then none of us would be here on this NG. D would have
> already failed. It is wanted. And the amount I want it right now is
> about $100-worth.
>
> --bb
From my point of view, every patches should apply to DMD frontend, so the
community gets benefit from it.
While the backend dev kit gives the possibility of not *sending* the patch
to DMD.
The current problem of DMD development is not every patch accepted or
reviewed before the next DMD release.
Time & partial class is the main problem prevent me from doing some
backend related stuff. I hope more people can get involved into this. And
make dparser an experiment ground so people can firstly test their willing
features in dparser.
--
使用 Opera 革命性的电子邮件客户程序: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list