Unofficial wish list status.(Jul 2008)

[Walter Bright]

Jason House wrote:
> I must have really messed up something that I said somewhere along the line
> because you're the second person to think that!  writefln is neither
> invariant nor pure and would not be modified by this discussion.

My understanding was that you were suggesting that any function with any 
invariant arguments should also be pure. My apologies if that was a 
misunderstanding.